La cirugía mínimamente invasiva evolución y su aplicación en ginecología oncológica

Henry Valdivia; Albert Zevallos; Manuel Álvarez; Carlos Santos; Marco Sánchez

doi:10.31403/rpgo.v59i66

Authors

Henry Valdivia Departamento de Cirugía Ginecológica del Instituto Nacional de Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
Albert Zevallos Departamento de Cirugía Ginecológica del Instituto Nacional de Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
Manuel Álvarez Departamento de Cirugía Ginecológica del Instituto Nacional de Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
Carlos Santos Departamento de Cirugía Ginecológica del Instituto Nacional de Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
Marco Sánchez Departamento de Cirugía Ginecológica del Instituto Nacional de Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v59i66

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery in the management of gynecologic malignancies has increased considerably in the last decade. The ability to perform minimally surgical procedures has revolutionized care and quality of life outcomes for patients. In this article, we review innovations in minimally invasive surgery and its applications are discussed as well as the experience at National Institute of Neoplasic Diseases of Peru in the treatment of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer.

Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery, cancer of endometrium, cancer of uterine cervix, cancer of ovary, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, single-port laparoscopy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000;42(1):87-90

Litynski GS. Laparoscopy – the early attempts: spotlighting Georg Kelling and Hans Christian Jacobaeus. JSLS. 1997;1:83-5

Clarke R. Asimov’s laws for robotics: implications for information technology. IEEE Computer. 1993;26(12):53- 61; 1994;27(1):57-66.

Challacombe BJ, Kavoussi LR, Dasgupta P. Transoceanic telerobotic surgery. BJU Int. 2003;92:678.

Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M. The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1389-93.

Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT, Ramirez PT. Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):501-5.

Wheeless CR. A rapid, inexpensive and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparascopy. JReprod Med. 1969;3(5):65-9.

Wheeless CR Jr, Thompson BH. Laparascopic sterilization. Review of 3600 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;42(5):751-8.

Pelosi MA, Pelosi 3rd MA. Laparascopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. NEJM. 1991;88:721-6.

Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology. Technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):157-61.

Dowdy S, Borah B, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Weaver AL, Mc- Gree ME, Haas LR, Keeney GL, Mariani A, Podratz KC. Prospective assessment of survival, morbidity and cost associated with lymphadenectomy in low risk endometrial cancer. Ginecol Oncol. 2012;127:5-10.

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, , Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Spiegel G, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5331-6.

Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):695-700.

Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Puntambekar S, Milam MR, Bevers MW, Brown J, Slomovitz BM, Ramirez PT. Comparison of laparascopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):96-102.

Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissectioncase report. Eur J GynecolOncol. 2006;27(5):531-3.

Nezhat F, Datta M, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. 2008;12(3):227-37.

Geetha P, Nair MK. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8(3):67-73.

Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumowitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, Ramirez PT. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):584-8.

Ocon R. Tesis para optar el titulo de Ginecólogo Oncólogo. “Estadiaje completo versus estadiaje complementario en el manejo del cáncer de ovario en el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas desde 1997 hasta el 2004”.

Lehner R, Wenzi R, Heinzl H, Husslein P, Sevelda P. Influence of delayed staging laparotomy after laparoscopic removal of ovarian masses later found malignant. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:967-71.

Webb MJ, Decker DG, Mussey E, Williams TJ. Factors influencing survival in stage I ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;116(2):222-8.

Trimbos JB, Hacker NF. The case against aspirating ovarian cysts. Cancer. 1993;72:828.

Angioli R, Muzii L, Battista C, Terranova C, Oronzi I, Sereni MI, et al. The role of laparoscopy in ovarian carcinoma. Minerva Ginecol. 2009;61(1):35-43.

Spirtos NM, Eisekop SM, Boike G, Schlaerth JB, Cappellari JO. Laparoscopic staging in patient with incompletely staged cancers of the uterus, ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1645-9.

Sánchez M, Alvarez M, Santos C y col. Rol de la laparoscopia en el manejo del cáncer de ovario avanzado. Acta Cancerológica. 2012;41(2):23-8.