FOLLICLE SYNDROME NOT BROKEN LUTEINIZING

Authors

  • Juan Coyotupa Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
  • Norman Koremblit Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
  • Eduardo Maradiegue Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
  • Carlos Carrillo Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
  • Luis Noriega Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú
  • Gustavo Gonzáles Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v31i617

Abstract

144 patients who follicle syndrome luteinised not broken with 450 menstrual cycles in which ovulation had ultrasounds to, determination of prolactin, progesterone and evaluated diagnostic laparoscopy. It has been found that 72% of patients had an organic cause as adhesions, endometriosis or both. 28% of patients remaining 18% was associated with hyperprolactinemia as a cause of the syndrome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-05-17

How to Cite

Coyotupa, J., Koremblit, N., Maradiegue, E., Carrillo, C., Noriega, L., & Gonzáles, G. (2015). FOLLICLE SYNDROME NOT BROKEN LUTEINIZING. The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 31(3), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v31i617

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>