Controversies in the treatment of incomplete abortion, MVA versus medical treatment with misoprostol

Authors

  • Miguel Gutiérrez Ramos Médico Ginecólogo Obstetra, Director General de Pathfinder International Oficina de Perú, Director del Instituto de Salud Popular (INSAP) y de ESAR Perú, Past Presidente de la Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Miembro Permanente del Comité Consultivo de Asesores Externos del INMP
  • Enrique Guevara Ríos Salud Popular (INSAP) y de ESAR Perú, Past Presidente de la Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Miembro Permanente del Comité Consultivo de Asesores Externos del INMP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v61i416

Abstract

Non-complicated incomplete abortion is one of the most frequent obstetric emergencies in our health facilities, causing high care costs. There are two current modern methods for its attention: manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and medical treatment with misoprostol, both with the possibility of outpatient management, reducing costs to the health system. Controversies between the two technologies are analyzed and it is concluded that both MVA and misoprostol treatments are modern technologies applicable in gynecology and obstetrics services in our country, with same safety and effectiveness by evidence of many studies conducted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-05-05

How to Cite

Gutiérrez Ramos, M., & Guevara Ríos, E. (2015). Controversies in the treatment of incomplete abortion, MVA versus medical treatment with misoprostol. The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 61(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v61i416

Issue

Section

Controversias

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>