Translabial intrapartum ultrasound in determining duration of the second stage of labor

Authors

  • Renato Zúñiga Hospital Regional Honorio Delgado, Arequipa, Perú
  • John Apaza Hospital Regional Honorio Delgado, Arequipa, Perú
  • Sergio Puma Hospital Regional Honorio Delgado, Arequipa, Perú
  • Gustavo Chávez Hospital Regional Honorio Delgado, Arequipa, Perú
  • Luis Cáceres Hospital Regional Honorio Delgado, Arequipa, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v59i62

Abstract

Evaluation of the second stage of labor is still subjective. Translabial intrapartum ultrasound is an objective evaluation tool of progression of the various stages of childbirth. Objectives: To determine the usefulness of translabial intrapartum ultrasound study in determining duration of the second stage of labor. Design: Observational, prospective and relationship study. Setting: Honorio Delgado Regional Hospital, Arequipa, Peru. Participants: Women in the second stage of labor. Interventions: From April through July 2012 53 patients in second stage of labor and who delivered vaginally underwent translabial ultrasound assessment of variety of position, direction, and angle of progression of the cephalic descent and its relation with duration of the second stage. Main outcome measures: Relation of cephalic descent and duration of the second stage. Results: There was a significant statistical relation (P < 0.05) between progression of the cephalic descent angle and duration of the second stage. According to simple linear regression, a greater progression angle predicted less duration of the second stage of labor. There was also statistically

significant relationship (P < 0.05) between duration and direction of the cephalic descent. Finally, the relationship between time and the variety of presentation was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Determination of the range of position, angle of progression and direction of the cephalic descent by using translabial ultrasound was useful to determine the duration of the second stage.

Keywords: Translabial ultrasound, progression angle, direction of the cephalic descent, variety of position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:331–6.

Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:313–9.

Cunningham G, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams Obstetrics, Chapter 6. F. Parturition. 23 edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies. 2010.

Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:493–9.

Mormontoy. Elaboración del Proyecto de investigación en ciencias de salud, conducta y afines. Boehringer Ingelheim, Lima, Perú. 1993.

Published

2014-01-20

How to Cite

Zúñiga, R., Apaza, J., Puma, S., Chávez, G., & Cáceres, L. (2014). Translabial intrapartum ultrasound in determining duration of the second stage of labor. The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 59(4), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v59i62

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales