Cost-utility of preventive interventions for breast cancer in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v58i41Abstract
Objective: To determine the cost utility of preventive interventions against breast cancer in Peruvian women. Design: Cost-utility type economic evaluation. Material: Epidemiologic parameters, costs. Interventions: A cost utility analysis using Markov model based on the information of epidemiological parameters, costs associated with breast cancer and usefulness was performed. Costs were from the payer perspective (Health Ministry) compared with adjusted life years (QALYs) and used a discount rate of 5%. Main outcome measures: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The annual cost of breast self-examination intervention was USD 10 410 811, for clinical breast examination was 45 007 733.76, with mammography was USD 46 624 661.45 and for intervention with tamoxifen was $ 4 705 800. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE) was 2 639.6 USD / QALY.
Conclusions: The intervention with mammography was more cost-effective than other interventions. Key words: Breast neoplasms, mammography, tamoxifen, costeffectiveness analysis (source: MeSH NLM).
Downloads
References
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.
Velásquez A, Seclén Y, Poquioma E, Cachay C, Espinoza R. Munayco C. La carga de enfermedad y lesiones en el Perú: ajustado con datos nacionales de morbilidad y mortalidad. Lima: MINSA/USAID; 2009.
Marzo-Castillejo M, et al. Recomendaciones para el cribado del cáncer de mama con mamografía en población de riesgo medio. Actualización PAPPS 2012. Aten Primaria. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2012.03.005
Perú, INEN. Resolución Jefatural N°120-RJ-INEN-2008: Norma técnico oncológica para la prevención, detección y diagnóstico temprano del cáncer de mama a nivel nacional. Lima: INEN; 2008
Perú, INEN. Resolución Jefatural N°012-2011-J/INEN: Guías clínicas en base a la Guía del NCCN Cáncer de mama. Lima: INEN; 2011.
Perú, Ministerio de Salud. Plan esencial de aseguramiento en salud (PEAS). Plan de beneficios del PEAS. Lima: MINSA; 2009.
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd Edition. Oxford:Oxford University Press; 2005
Ginsberg GM, Lauer JA, Zelle S, Baeten S, Baltussen R. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344:e614.
Ishikawa Y, Hirai K, Saito H, Fukuyoshi J, Yonekura A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention designed to increase breast cancer screening among a non-adherent population: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):760.
Noah-Vanhoucke J, Green LE, Dinh TA, Alperin P, Smith RA. Cost-effectiveness of chemoprevention of breast cancer using tamoxifen in a postmenopausal US population. Cancer. 2011;117(15):3322-31.
Mushlin A, Koude R, Shapiro D. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:143-53.
Romaní F, Gutiérrez C, Ramos-Castillo J. Autoexamen de mama en mujeres peruanas: prevalencia y factores sociodemográficos asociados. Análisis de la Encuesta Demográfica de Salud Familiar (ENDES). An Fac med. 2011;72(1):23-31.
Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1784-92.
Meltzer MI. Introduction to health economics for physicians. Lancet. 2001;358(9286):993-8.
Gutiérrez S. Cáncer: costos de tratamiento en Perú. Acción Internacional para la Salud, Oficina de Coordinación América Latina y el Caribe, Lima:Perú; 2009.
Perú, Ministerio de Salud. RM N° 195-2009/MINSA: Documento Técnico “Metodología para la Estimación de Costos Estándar en los Establecimientos de Salud”. Lima: MINSA; 2009.
Peasgood T, Ward SE, Brazier J. Health-state utility values in breast cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(5):553-66.
Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K, Howell A; International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I Investigators. Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer--96-month follow-up of the randomized
IBIS-I trial. Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(4):272-82.
Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan B, Nygren P, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: systematic evidence review update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Review Update No. 74. AHRQ Publication No. 10-05142-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2009.
Banco Mundial; [2 páginas]. Disponible en: URL:http://datos.bancomundial.org/pais/peru
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Esta revista provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente la investigación al publico, lo cual fomenta un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.
