Heterologous intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate using embryo transfer cannula

Authors

  • Roly Hilario Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
  • Julio Dueñas Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
  • José Chávez Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
  • Rocío Romero Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
  • Vanessa Tesén Centro de Fertilidad Procrear

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v59i31

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the heterologous intrauterine insemination (H-IUI), rate of pregnancy by using embryo transfer cannula. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Procrear Fertility Center, Lima, Peru. Participants: Couples in infertility treatment. Interventions: All H-IUI procedures using sperm bank donor semen from 2007 through September 2010 were studied, all performed by the same gynecologist and the same biologist. IUI was performed using Frydman-Soft embryo transfer cannula with guide following cervix measurement by ultrasound. Rate of pregnancy per cycle and per patient was analyzed as well as factors associated with pregnancy. Epi Info 3.5.1 was used for statistical analysis. Main outcome measures: Pregnancy rate. Results: Thirty H-IUI proceedings were performed in 26 patients with average age 32.6 ± 5.5 years (range: 20-41 years), 40% over 35 years. Pregnancy rate was 40% per cycle and 46% per patient. Most (87%) had only one attempt. Age less than 35 years and 2 to 4 follicles more than 17 mm were related to best results. Having an obstructed tube, endometrial thickness ≤ 6 mm, or insemination after cycle day 15 were associated to negative results. Conclusions: Heterologous IUI with Frydman-Soft embryo transfer cannula provided excellent results in conception and served for training physicians who still do not perform high-complexity procedures. Keywords: Artificial insemination, heterologous, embryo transfer cannula, cryopreserved sperm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Remohí J, Bellver Pradas J, Matorras Weinig R, Ballesteros Boluda A, Pellicer A. Manual Práctico de Esterilidad y Reproducción Humana, 3ra. Edición. Editorial PMédica Panamericana, 2008.

Ferrara I, Balet R, Grudzinskas JG. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2320-4.

Vitthala S, Gelbaya TA, Hunter H, Roberts SA, Nardo LG. Stimulated intrauterine insemination (SIUI) and donor insemination (DI) as first line management for a selected subfertile population: the Manchester experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(9-10):431-6.

A. Nyboe Andersen AN, Goosens V, Bhattacharia S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, and the European IFV-monitoring (IM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embriology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe,2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE, Hum Reprod. 2009:24(6):1267–87.

Zhang Y, Chen XQ, Yang XY, Dong J, Qian XQ, Wang W, Mao YD, Liu JY. [Clinical value of artificial insemination by donor]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010;16(1):20-3.

Published

2013-10-05

How to Cite

Hilario, R., Dueñas, J., Chávez, J., Romero, R., & Tesén, V. (2013). Heterologous intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate using embryo transfer cannula. The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 59(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v59i31

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales