Resultados preliminares de cultivo intravaginal de ovocitos-inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (INVO-ICSI), en el Centro de Fertilidad Procrear

Roly Hilario; Julio Dueñas; Max Gonzales; Javier García; Rocío Romero

doi:10.31403/rpgo.v60i115

Authors

Roly Hilario Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
Julio Dueñas Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
Max Gonzales Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
Javier García Centro de Fertilidad Procrear
Rocío Romero Centro de Fertilidad Procrear

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v60i115

Abstract

Objectives: To determine preliminary results of pregnancy rate per transfer in patients undergoing intravaginal oocyte culture-intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (INVO-ICSI) at a fertility center. Design: Descriptive, series of cases study. Setting: Procrear Fertility Center, Lima, Peru. Participants: Couples with infertility treatment. Interventions: Thirteen INVO–ICVSI performed in 12 patients from December 2011 through July 2013 were reviewed. SPSS program was used. Main outcome measures: Pregnancy rate. Results: Women’s average age was 35.38 years ± 3.35 and were seeking pregnancy 2.25 years ± 1.88 average. Infertility was due to male factor in 46.2% and to female factor in 53.2%. Embryo transfer was done in all cycles and 5 pregnancies were obtained (38.46% of cycles), 3 singleton (60%) and 2 double pregnancy (40%). Conclusions: INVO-ICSI fertilization rate was comparable and aceptable against other fertilization techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ranoux C, Foulot H, Uubriot FX, Poirot C, Dubuisson JB, Chevallier O, Cardone V. A new in vitro fertilization technique, intravaginal culture. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:654–7.

Ranoux C, Seibel MM. New techniques in fertilization: intravaginal culture and microvolume straw. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990;7(1):6–8.

Costoya AL, Caffati CM, Galdan AA. Experience with intravaginal culture for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1991;8:360-1.

Navarro-Carbonell DE, Pulido-Torres C, Saa-Madriñán AM, Lucena-Quevedo E. Comparación de la calidad embrionaria entre fertilización in vitro (FIV) y cultivo intravaginal de ovocitos (INVO) en el Centro Colombiano de Fertilidad y Esterilidad - CECOLFES, Bogotá, Colombia. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2012;63(3):234-40.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Reproductive health, Assisted reproductive technology. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports 2008.

Shenfield F, de Mouzon j, Penning G, Ferrareti AP, AP, Nyboe Andersen A, de Wert G, Goossens V. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1361–8.

Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG; European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2009;24(6):1267-87. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep035.

Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A; European IVF-monitoring (EIM);Consortium for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2571-84.

Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida. Registros anuales. 2009. Disponible en: http://www.redlara.com/aa_espanhol/registro_anual.asp?categoria=Registros%20anuales&cadastroid=317.