Inseminación intrauterina o fertilización in vitro en factor masculino

Alejandro Manzur

doi:10.31403/rpgo.v60i104

Authors

Alejandro Manzur Jefe Unidad de Reproducción Humana, División de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Presidente de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Medicina Reproductiva (ALMER)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v60i104

Abstract

Arguments for and against intrauterine insemination versus in vitro fertilization/ICSI in cases of infertile couples with male factor are discussed. Several variables influencing the results must be considered prior to indicatingthe technique, including cost-benefit and proportionality of the therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, fifth edition, 2010.

Wainer R, Albert M, Dorion A, Bailly M, Bergere M, Lombroso R, Gombault M, Selva J. Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2060-5.

van der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(6):359-64.

Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG. Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(1):74-81.

Ombelet W. Evidence-based recommendations for IUI in daily practice. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2013;18 (2):74-7.

Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida 2009, disponible en: www.redlara.com