Rol de la ecografía en el manejo de la Infertilidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v58i79Resumen
La ecografía tiene un rol primordial en el diagnóstico y manejo de la paciente infértil, por lo cual debe ser una herramienta imprescindible en el consultorio y en cada centro de reproducción. Es importante en el diagnóstico inicial del factor uterino y ovárico, así como complementario en lesiones cervicales y tubáricas. La instilación transcervical de suero salino permite mejor visualización de lesiones intracavitarias durante la ecografía TV (histerosonografía). Es así que la histerosonografía representa un examen de rutina en la evaluación de la cavidad uterina en los tratamientos de reproducción asistida (TRA). En el manejo de la paciente infértil es necesario realizar monitoreo ecográfico de ovulación para ciclos de baja y alta complejidad. También cumple rol determinante en los ciclos de TRA de alta complejidad durante la aspiración folicular y actualmente durante la transferencia embrionaria. Su uso para aspiración de quistes foliculares se limita a casos excepcionales y el uso del Doppler en infertilidad es aun controversial y muy poco práctico.Descargas
Citas
Kratochwil A, Urban G, Friedrich F. Ultrasonic tomography of the ovaries. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1972; 61:211-4.
Hackeloer BJ, Nitschke S, Daume E. Ultrasonics of the ovarian changes under gonadotropin stimulation. Gerburtshife Frauenheilkd. 1977;37:185-90.
Hackeloer BJ, Fleming R, Robinson HP. Correlation of ultrasonic and endocrinologic assessment of human follicle development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;135:122-8.
Nitschke-Dabelstein S. Monitoring of follicular development using ultrasonography. Infertility: Male and female. New York: Churchill-Livingstone. 1983:356-71.
Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Batcha M, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Campbell B, et al. The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2009;94(5):1775-81.
The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM. Revised consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:19-25.
Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale H, Futterweit W, et al. Position statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4237-45.
Saunders R, Shwayder J, Nakajima S. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2171-9.
Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Lin Tan S. Prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two and three dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Feril Steril. 2003;79(5):1222-5.
Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Banas T, Knafel A, Mieddzyblocki M, Basta A. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus. Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(3):178-86.
Dawood Y, Jarret J. Prolonged retention of intrauterine fetal bones after abortion causing infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:715-7.
Asherman JG. Amenorrhea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynecaecol Br Emp. 1948;55:23-9.
Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:87-95.
Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Lin Tan S. Prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two and three dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(5):1222-5.
Steptoe P, Edwards R. Laparoscopic recovery of preovulatory human oocytes after priming of ovaries with gonadotropins. Lancet. 1970;1:683-9.
Lenz S, Lauritsen JG, Kjellow M. Collection of human oocyte for in vitro fertilization by ultrasonically guided folicular puncture. Lancet. 1982;1:1163-4.
Parson J, Riddle A, Booker M, Sharma V, Goswamy R, Wilson L, et al. Oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization by ultrasonically guided needle aspiration via the urethra. Lancet. 1985;1:1076–7.
Gleicher N, Friberg J, Giglia N, Mayden K, Kesky T, Siegel I. Egg retrieval for in vitro fertilization by sonographically controlled vaginal culdocentesis. Lancet. 1983;1:508-9.
Wickland M, Lennart M, Hamberger L. Transvesical and transvaginal approaches for the aspiration of follicles by the use of ultrasound. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985; 442:182-94.
Feichtinger W, Kemeter P. Transvaginal sector scan sonographyfor needled guided transvaginal follicle aspiration and other applications in ynecologic routine and 21. Ludwig AK, Glawatz M, Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Perioperative and post-operative complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: prospective study of > 1000 oocyte retrievals. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3235-40.
Aragona C, Mohamed M, Salom M, Linari A, Percorini F, Micara G. Clinical complications after transvaginal oocyte retrieval in 7098 IVF. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):293-4.
Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB, Yang V. Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:54–61.
Abou-Setta A, Mansour R, Al-Inany H, Aboulgar M, Aboulgar A, Serour G. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guided over clinical touch alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:333–41.
Brown J, Buckingham K, Abou-Setta A, Buckett W. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1. 2007; Art. No.: CD006107. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006107.pub2.
Drakeley A, Jorgensen A, Sklavounos J, Aust T, Gazvani R, Williamson P, Kingsland C. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 2295 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers. Human Reprod. 2008;23(5):1101-6.
Bodri D, Colodron M, Garcıa D, Obradors A, Vernaeve V, Coll O. Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2263-8
Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu B, Yarali H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1341–5
Abou-Setta AM. What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:611–9.
Segal S, Isaacson K, Chang Y, Leykin L. The effect of baseline ovarian cyst on the outcome in IVF. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(1):S200.
Fiszbajn G, Lipowicz R, Elberger L, Grabia A, Papier S, Brugo Olmedo S, et al. Conservative management versus aspiration of functional ovarian cysts before ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17(5):260-3. research. Fertil Steril. 1986;54:722-5.